Make.com vs n8n
In-depth technical comparison to help you choose the right data infrastructure tool for your stack.
Make.com
Make (formerly Integromat) is a leading visual automation platform with a drag-and-drop scenario builder, routers, data aggregators, and complex logic.
n8n
n8n is a powerful open-source workflow automation platform that can be self-hosted without execution limits, ideal for technical data flows.
📊 Comparison Table
| Feature | Make.com | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price/mo | $9★ Cheaper | $20 |
| Pricing Model | monthly_sub | monthly_sub |
| JS Rendering | ❌ | ✅ |
| CAPTCHA Bypass | ❌ | ❌ |
| Residential Proxies | ❌ | ❌ |
| Free Tier | ✅ | ✅ |
| Base Concurrency | 1 threads | 100 threads★ Higher |
| SDK & Languages | No-Code (Visual), HTTP/REST Generic Module, JSON | JavaScript, Python, No-Code (Visual), REST API Integration |
🎯 Make.com is best for
Automation engineers and technical agencies building complex, multi-branch data transformation pipelines without writing custom backend code.
🎯 n8n is best for
Data engineers, DevOps teams, and technical startups wanting to automate high-volume data workflows without paying per-task fees.
🏆 The Verdict
Make.com is the recommended choice if you prioritize cost efficiency (lower starting price).Automation engineers and technical agencies building complex, multi-branch data transformation pipelines without writing custom backend code.
n8n stands out if your workload demands higher throughput (100 vs 1 threads).Data engineers, DevOps teams, and technical startups wanting to automate high-volume data workflows without paying per-task fees.