🕷️ScrapingTools.dev
🚀 For Creators & Providers

List your B2B Tool

Building a Web Scraping API, proxy network, or data automation platform? Add your tool to our directory to reach thousands of engineers and data teams.

Share your affiliate signup or referral link so we can feature your official partner tracking.

If Featured is selected, we will review your tool and send a secure Stripe invoice upon approval to activate your top banner.

⚖️ Comparison 2026

Ahrefs API vs Majestic API

In-depth technical comparison to help you choose the right data infrastructure tool for your stack.

Option 1

Ahrefs API

Ahrefs API provides programmatic access to the industry's most accurate backlink database, keyword metrics, organic traffic, and site health data.

$129/mo
Visit Ahrefs API →
Option 2

Majestic API

Majestic API provides deep backlink intelligence powered by proprietary Trust Flow and Citation Flow metrics for granular link profile audits.

$99/mo
Visit Majestic API →

📊 Comparison Table

FeatureAhrefs APIMajestic API
Starting Price/mo$129$99★ Cheaper
Pricing Modelmonthly_submonthly_sub
JS Rendering
CAPTCHA Bypass
Residential Proxies
Free Tier
Base Concurrency20 threads★ Higher20 threads
SDK & LanguagesPython, Node.js, REST API IntegrationPython, PHP, C#, Java

🎯 Ahrefs API is best for

Enterprise SEO platforms, digital agencies, and SaaS tools requiring gold-standard backlink and keyword difficulty data.

🎯 Majestic API is best for

Link building specialists, SEO agencies, and domain investors needing granular link quality metrics and backlink topical classifications.

🏆 The Verdict

Ahrefs API is the recommended choice if you prioritize advanced feature depth and need built-in JavaScript rendering.Enterprise SEO platforms, digital agencies, and SaaS tools requiring gold-standard backlink and keyword difficulty data.

Majestic API stands out if your workload demands specialized infrastructure features.Link building specialists, SEO agencies, and domain investors needing granular link quality metrics and backlink topical classifications.